AGQ Labs is a registered Spanish laboratory with verified institutional identity and documented analytical competence, but currently lacks public evidence of a peptide-specific testing offering.
AGQ Labs: Registered Spanish Laboratory with ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation
AGQ Labs operates as a registered Spanish legal entity under the name LABS & TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES AGQ SOCIEDAD LIMITADA (CIF B91607127, registered with the Mercantile Registry of Seville). The laboratory holds active ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditation through IAS and names leadership with public profiles, including founder and Executive President Estanislao Martínez and AGQ Labs USA Lab Director Maria Pena, who has held that role since May 2012. The lab discloses concrete instrumentation, specifically GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS.
Does AGQ Labs offer a report-verification service and what are its documented testing areas?
AGQ Labs provides an online report-verification portal at agqlabs.es/verify, which we could not test with a real report and therefore count as an offered process rather than proven functionality. Its documented competence is in pesticide residue, agri-food, and environmental chromatography-based testing - a transferable analytical foundation, but not peptide-specific.
Evidence Limits: No Peptide-Specific Offering or Accreditation Scope
None of the IAS accreditation scopes (TL-509, TL-972, TL-923, TL-1095) list peptide analysis, identity verification, quantitation, or purity testing. The lab's Life Science page references pharmaceutical QC broadly without a peptide-specific scope. Additionally, neutral public-evidence limits apply: we have no verified method-validation data for peptide-relevant matrices, no independent performance evidence, and no community reputation footprint in the peptide context. The lab's website is Spanish-only and pricing requires a contact form.
Why is AGQ Labs rated 'Listed' instead of 'Substantiated'?
AGQ Labs holds a 'Listed' rating rather than 'Substantiated' because no public signal evidences a peptide or research-chemical testing offering. This is an open question about scope, not an indication of incompetence. No concrete open concern - such as a complaint pattern or a refuted accreditation claim - is on record. These are signals, not a verdict.