Peptidetesting

All labs

Analytical Formulations

analyticalformulations.com

A US lab lists peptide testing services on its website. Its advertised report-verification portal returns a 404 error, and the website shows only repeated Terms and Conditions content.

Watch from four separately substantiated review fields. See why

We found open questions that nobody has cleared up. That is not an accusation of fraud, but a reason to look closer.

What it does not mean: this is not a verdict on measurement quality, on any single certificate, or on the safety of a product.

Watch profile: widely used, but with unresolved signals below. Popularity is not verification - read the signals and their sources. Think this rating is too strict? Perhaps. But a lab should mind the details - when it does not, that too is a signal.

Can I get tested here?

To the website: analyticalformulations.com
Indicative price
On request
Location
San Antonio, Texas, United States Americas

Why we say this

The overall assessment is not an average of these four fields. Each field answers a different question and cannot offset another.

Not publicly established

Who is behind the laboratory?

The public evidence does not currently establish a responsible issuer.

Boundary: Identity and responsibility do not establish analytical competence.

View 4 signals and their evidence
Signal profile - Counts show composition, not a score. Core evidence 0 Supporting evidence 0 Boundary 4 Contradiction 0
  • Neutral No business-register entry could be found. The laboratory does not claim one.
  • Neutral No street address or registered seat found in any official government register; BBB profile lists San Antonio, Texas but provides no registered address from a state Secretary of State or equivalent.
  • Neutral No named real person could be documented for this laboratory; only an anonymous team.
  • Neutral BBB lists San Antonio, Texas, US, but no Texas Secretary of State or other official government register entry was found to confirm the corporate domicile by a primary source.
Not publicly established

Is the procedure technically substantiated for peptides?

Public evidence does not currently substantiate competence for the relevant method and peptide matrix.

Boundary: Lack of accreditation is normal here and is not a negative signal.

View 3 signals and their evidence
Signal profile - Counts show composition, not a score. Core evidence 0 Supporting evidence 0 Boundary 3 Contradiction 0
  • Positive The laboratory holds no accreditation and claims none. Absence of accreditation is the norm for a lab that accepts private samples; the honest statement of it is a signal.
  • Neutral No verifiable accreditation. For a laboratory that accepts private samples this is the norm, not a mark against it.
  • Neutral Domain age approximately 246 days; no years of operation claimed by the lab on its website.
Verification route contradicted

Can a report be traced back through the issuer?

An advertised route or the issuer assignment conflicts with the substantiated check.

Boundary: Report confirmation establishes neither analytical competence nor the contents of an individual vial.

View 1 signal and its evidence
Signal profile - Counts show composition, not a score. Core evidence 0 Supporting evidence 0 Boundary 0 Contradiction 1
Method
advertised_broken
Verification path
https://analyticalformulations.com/reports
  • Watch The laboratory advertises certificate verification, but the advertised page does not exist (HTTP 404 when fetched).
Not publicly established

Has actual measurement performance been checked externally?

No suitable independent evidence of actual measurement performance was publicly established.

Boundary: Testimonials, report volume and average purity values are not external performance evidence.

No public signals in this review field.

Read our full reasoning

Reports from Analytical Formulations cannot currently be verified through any independent public channel.

  • The laboratory lists peptide testing services including purity analysis, mass spectrometry, stability studies, and degradation identification, and it does not falsely claim any accreditation it cannot support.
  • However, the advertised certificate-verification portal at analyticalformulations.com/reports returns an HTTP 404, meaning that any report issued by this lab cannot be independently confirmed through the mechanism the lab itself promotes.
  • The website consists only of Terms and Conditions content repeated across multiple URLs including /services and /reports, with no actual service descriptions, about page, or laboratory information visible.
  • No business-register entry was found in any official government database, no verified physical address exists beyond a BBB listing of San Antonio, Texas without a registered address from the Texas Secretary of State, and no named personnel are documented.
  • The domain is approximately 246 days old, and none of the 18 provided sources mention Analytical Formulations by name, yielding zero community discussions, complaint patterns, or regulatory records.

The absence of accreditation, registration, and named personnel is the normal case for a lab accepting private samples and is not itself an accusation; these gaps only mean the directory cannot vouch beyond what is publicly checkable. The concrete open concern is the non-functional verification portal combined with a template-only website: a lab that advertises report verification but provides no working verification page, no service content, and no detectable reputation footprint presents a specific, checkable problem rather than a mere absence of depth. These are signals, not a verdict.

What this rests on

The material this assessment is built on.

Public information only
Registration, payment, verification
Legal entity
Analytical Formulations Inc

Accreditation

ISO/IEC 17025: Not accredited Two secondary laboratory tracking databases report no ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation on file. Primary accreditation body registers (A2LA, ANAB, PJLA) were not directly consulted. The lab does not appear to make deceptive accreditation claims.

Full evidence apparatus

Sources and public record

These signals describe access, the public trail and documents. They do not colour any of the four review fields.

Access and offering · 2
  • Positive The site lists "Peptides" as a testing category with "Purity, sequence verification, degradation analysis" and methods including "Purity Analysis, Mass Spectrometry, Stability Studies, Degradation ID", and separately lists "SARMs & Research" with "Identification, purity, contaminants".
  • Neutral No pricing information found on any crawled page. Services are described but no prices listed.
Public and digital trail · 2
  • Neutral The entire site content appears to be only the Terms and Conditions page repeated across multiple URLs (/services, /reports). No actual service descriptions, about page, or lab information visible.
  • Neutral None of the 18 provided sources mention 'Analytical Formulations' by name; zero matches were found across all sources. No community forum discussions, complaint patterns, or regulatory enforcement records for this entity exist in the evidence set.
Domain & digital trail
Domain registered
2025-11-15 (0.7 age)
Registrar
NameCheap, Inc.
TLS
Let's Encrypt

Audit complete

Show all 115 sources

For lab operators

Run this lab? You can confirm the entry and correct it.

Claim this lab
This profile is built from public sources and reviewed by hand. It shows where each fact comes from. A listing is a set of signals, not an endorsement or a verdict - and never a guarantee. Presence and order cannot be purchased.